March 06, 2012

Saved from hopelessness and lies... or the new paradigm in medicine- Meta medicine




My faith in modern medicine has seen countless and countless heavy hurtful hits. Coming from a background of studying and in fact being passionate about mainstream science, namely genetics, for the purpose of healing, I have since then gone through a long journey of ups and downs, ending up on the one side free of opinions of the mainstream medicinal "facts" we were taught which actually ended up being only theories of the time, but also sometimes quite upset about the possible/probable lies that are being not only propagated, but sustained long after there is wide-spread scientific disagreement. For example for about 25 years much of the scientific world and many brilliant respectable figures have been in doubt or in outright refusal over the issue of HIV causing AIDS and in fact over such a virus existing in the first place as it has never been shown, separated or proven. The same lack of proof goes for the existence of rabies, questions like whether blood transfusions are actually harmful and causing death, the adverse effects of vaccines etc etc. The repercussions of the adversaries being right, even as a possibility only- is criminal, the death toll huge, suicides tragic. 
The power of dogma in science is preposterous, it seems as soon as a claim is made and an opinion propagated- scientists are ashamed to go back on it regardless even of their own better judgement. Not even that but contrary to the premise (and promise) of science- anything contradictory is never even heard, discussed or tested. (I always have an image of an ostrich with its head buried under the sand with this, praying heartfully- it's not there, it doesn't exist, if I can't see it, it must mean I'm safe.) 

"Errors of this kind occur whenever technology makes available for general use a new experimental procedure, which propels a whole army of researchers into mass producing experimental data, heedless of what the biological significance, if any, of their work might be. Even worse, is the habit of making countless ad hoc adjustments to the original theory, which completely distort the original hypothesis. Correct science demands that there should be a radical re-think when this happens. If there isn't, as in this case, a fundamentally flawed concept goes haywire ending in disaster."

Perfect fitting quote also by Goethe,
"It is a dire example of how a distinguished scholar who has contributed much to the advancement of science, now impedes further progress by his stubborn adherence to a dogma of his own creation. If he did not feel himself obliged to repeat things, that are untrue just because they were once said, they would have become quite different people."

Any of the scientists resisting the old dogma and advocating new facts are instantly completely discredited, usually lose their jobs and have to work in another hostile world of holistic/alternative science, which is full of charlatans as much as truth-seekers, some of those genuine aware scientists who have simply been ostracized, who spit out jewels; and some of that other breed dealing with greedy lies cause they care just for profit. No wonder the alternative side is not respected. 

The same sad fate befell a german scientist Ryke Geerd Hamer. He was ridiculed, his livelihood was taken away, he was thrown in jail, he ended up in exile. Yet his theories were never discredited, only proven. His only fault- the utter dogmatism of traditional medicine, afraid for their lives and livelihoods. Read bio here.

"I finally had to ask myself whether our understanding and our concept of disease had not
been entirely wrong because of our ignorance of the biological
purpose of disease."

Yet thanks to his wonderful work there's a whole new paradigm in medicine emerging now in Europe, called German New Medicine in Germany, Sacred Medicine (la Medicina Sagrada) in Spain and Meta Medicine everywhere else and my faith in the future of medicine has been restored. This is not new knowledge. The ancients knew that everything was inter-connected, that the source of "illness" was first in the psyche and only later in the body, and if we want to know the cause of any disease, to understand it and heal it truly- we have to go back to the psyche. What dr. Hamer did was actually prove through scientific methods, through scanning the middle-man between the mind and the body ie the brain that this connection exists.
Meta medicine gives not only the power of healing but also the responsibility of healing to one person and one person only- YOU. But it is an entirely positive consciousness and wisdom, cause we also understand that the body is a self-healing mechanism and the earth itself, including the so-far-considered-harmful organisms such as bacteria are actually there to help us, we have all the support system we will ever need. 

A simply wonderful source of information on meta medicine here 

I thoroughly recommend this video for self-education on the question- what is actually disease

18 comments:

  1. Anyway I take back the criminal comment. The same way as the new more-to-date paradigms are not the truth yet by a long shot, we know so little and are completely in baby-steps, neither are the lies criminal, they are simply evolutionary stages and learning curves, it takes eons to change and everything happens in its right time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I force of your words ring true Hille. This is one of the reasons I love Gary Null; He resist dogma, and is a real progressive on all levels.

    Meta-Medicine is news to me, so thank you for the heads up. I will read the attached link soon. (((Hugs)))

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is the reason I love Gary Null also and he is the perfect example of the genuine true scientist, unrelenting in his passion for truth, who simply cannot fit with the dogmatic mainstream, yet how he works and how many he helps! Thanks for that, and you were probably the one to introduce him to me.
    Much metta and hugs!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I thought HIV is a virus? I don't get what that link is saying...that it's a virus is taken as a working assumption... as is all of science...because it works as a model to explain how it's transferred. Of course science shouldn't be taken as dogma. If I drop my pen it might not fall, but I assume it will and imagine gravity as the cause. Ah, but science is obsessed with inventing causes, the idols that replace the prima causa in religion of God. What might be interesting in meta medicine would be if it broke the dogma of cause and effect and said that causes might not really exist...

    ReplyDelete
  5. I actually agree with the fundamental premises of this new medicine, but I don't believe in any *particular* implementation of it, like Hamer's GNM. I'm just suspicious of his own dogmatism and protectionism, but I wish science and others catch up with these ideas.

    ReplyDelete
  6. HIV is a proposed virus, a sort of a bigfoot, which has never been isolated and proven and the original research and thesis was widely discredited. But then nobody has really seen many viruses, we just believe in them, science is very much a religion these days. http://www.garynull.com/home/is-hiv-really-the-cause-of-aids-are-there-really-only-a-few.html

    I completely respect your view and suspicion is the healthiest state you can have! Always to keep a percentage of that in any case.
    Many things clicked with me when I read the theory first, I had been thinking about such unifying theory and wishing for it but sometimes it just falls into place.
    Thanks okei, much metta!

    ReplyDelete
  7. A question that did arise for me or rather an understanding as I was searching for the correlating conflicts in the psyche to my most prevalent historical physical ailments... I saw that they were spot on for my main themes and life experiences- existential crises, separation and alienation from the herd and from home-land- the refugee syndrome, and separation pain from loved ones. My higher consciousness has chosen that path and is not only at peace but in happiness with that. Yet my body speaks a different story. As the meta medicine says- the same emotional patterns and coping mechanisms and herd mentality that has been evolved through eons and that we inherit from the animal kingdom- are still valid, whether we think we are beyond it or not, it can still cause pain and thus symptoms of "disease". This was interesting and humbling also. We are only babies as far as evolutionary consciousness is concerned and still very much linked to the biological emotions, whether we like it or not. Stepping stones.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Ah, this gnm site is more detailed than I realized... It is like a mapping process. The only thing it reminds me of are the ideas of mapping from feet, hands, pressure or acupuncture points to parts of the body (about which I know nothing), but this is tracing it back deeper to possible psychological causes. Openness to diagnostic possibilities...stepping stones like you say.

    In theory, viruses ought to be big enough to be seen under an electron microscope, so interesting if it's true that HIV has never been isolated and definitively identified as they claim. I didn't know there'd been this long controversy about this? On the contrary, all I heard was about the irresponsible actions of some South African figure denying the risk and endangering his partner.

    ReplyDelete
  9. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/nov/26/aids-south-africa
    This includes mother to child transmission... Scientists have to remain open to doubt for their dogma, but when it comes to effective policy making it's important too that they agree that there's a consensus which any individual might wish to differ. Otherwise those who differ are prioritized by society to create indecision. Usually difference is in degree, like the Earth is not flat, it's round but it is quite flat on average...the problem comes if dogma is completely the opposite of true and a Copernican revolution is needed, but even this is really a change of perspective. Even an old wrong perspective is not completely useless if we can see why we might have thought it...Aldous Huxley wrote how only humans can be intelligent enough to imagine drought to be caused by a rain demon or some ethical failing, not intelligent enough though for our own good...

    ReplyDelete
  10. The media is a circus, it serves very well the leading political and industrial interests.
    But I understand what you are saying and thats a very wise way to look at it. This era is so full of people wobbling in no-mans land cause there is too much conflicting information, but the confusion dissolves through time thank god, at least has for me.
    There has to be both in the world- energy to break down the lies completely and wisdom in preservation of that which was actually of value.
    I guess I'm just the first kind, I would just scrap everything 100 % and start over haha which I do. (People my age tend to be that way and many say its the indigo purpose). I took a 180 when I discovered that many scientists say that rabies might not have ever existed. Having taken travel shots and a rabies shot a few times this for me is appalling, being poisoned for nothing with a serious face and then asked money for it!! Never again for me, that goes for any vaccination.
    Thanks for your very interesting and well-thought out comments!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I don't know why you're so certain that rabies isn't a virus? Or is it that the vaccine is ineffective? I am suspicious of most vaccines, but some are good like eradicating polio, right? The annual flu jabs that Americans are encouraged to take obviously seems to be a big scam... But this is a good contrast: the guy who tested his idea on himself for getting rid of ulcers with antibiotics... And the establishment response! http://www.yourhealthbase.com/ulcer_drugs.htm and the tests of HIV vaccines on thousands of people in Thailand, where the result was very slightly positive...and yes, in my opinion looks totally down to chance :( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8272113.stm

    About the effectiveness of rabies vaccination, I don't know? Have there been many cases of people taking the vaccine and still getting infected, or is the vaccine itself dangerous? If the vaccine is poison, then you do believe in viruses after all! lol

    ReplyDelete
  12. By the way, I've mentioned before you are really similar in outlook to 4phae who isn't around much on Multiply these days, but who also goes under the name Just Be. But she's much older than you, so it's not a generational thing. I'm your generation but definitely not got your sensitivity and the confidence that goes with it:)

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't know why I'm so certain about most things. :) If I'm certain, then its something from within, I read things and some I feel others don't. Sometimes its 10/1 and I feel the truth in the one.
    Anyway- its like in the jury- as long as there is reasonable doubt. http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rabies.html
    These things dont really matter, I love to wind myself up by learning about the scams and lies but at the same time its all maya- even the "truths". Whatever you feel is right for you to feel for the moment.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Is there reasonable doubt in vaccines not working? In HIV not existing or not being the cause of AIDS, in blood transfusions not working, in antibiotics being harmful rather than helpful, in all of the manufactured chemical substances coming simply from human childish arrogance. Is it credible that nature is more wise than human beings? Is it credible that all this world was created to be one, to work as one, nothing to fight against, no enemies.. Its all yes for me, so thats what Im adhering to. :) I trust the oneness, life, earth, and my own body. Is science in tuned with that? I don't think so.

    ReplyDelete
  15. For sure! In the big picture, I totally agree with you. (edit: about rabies, don't know but thanks for the links!) The perspective of modern medicine is crudely about "waging war" against the "enemies of humankind" and "you're either with us or against us" (hence compulsory vaccinations). And this is true of all applied science... (not true of pure science though).

    As an individual, it's hard to dissociate though from this collective ego, and any attempt to do so could be perceived as in itself being egotistical (either to one's advantage - hitching a free ride from the protection of others like in choosing not to take a risky vaccine, or to one's detriment like the South African leader's decisions making his people suffer comparatively worse for not being covered by the same protection).

    The collective ego (society) calls the ego (individual) egotistical - the irony! And yet difficult to see how to defend against this accusation. We must insist on individual freedom before collective freedom? I think so! (Edit: actually I'm not sure, walking on the streets in the evening, it does seem that people don't use their freedoms too well, lol, and I was reminded of the statistic how the ban on public smoking in Scotland had had a significant beneficial effect on the health of babies whose mothers *didn't* smoke, because they were saved from passive smoking... so I'm uncertain to the end! ha)

    ReplyDelete
  16. By the way, I posted a link to this at BT a couple of days back which you might be interested in...
    http://noetic.org/noetic/issue-nineteen-february/hands-on-miracles/
    The word "noetic" comes from the Greek "nous" and means inner knowing. ;^) Fascinating site...

    ReplyDelete
  17. Very interesting article indeed, thanks okei!

    ReplyDelete